What is the difference between actus reus and mens rea. These are the fundamental principles of criminal liability. Mens rea, concurrence, causation sage publications. An injury caused without mens rea might be grounds for civil liability but typically not for criminal. This concept is the basis of todays legal test of guilt, which requires proof of fault. In conjunction with actus reus, a crime requires a criminal intent, or mens rea.
The reality is that criminal intent is just not much of an issue. Pdf on oct 29, 2012, courtney klein and others published guilty act, guilty mind. For instance, common law burglary is the breaking and entering of the dwelling house of another at night with the intent to commit a felony. The term actus reus may conceal important underlying principles, while the fact that mens rea is used in a number of different sense can also create issues. One core act is usually enough for actus reus under the mpc, but need to look at the statute to see if the. Mens rea vs actus reus those of us wellversed in the field of criminal law have no difficulty in distinguishing the terms mens rea and actus reus and identifying the different between them. Fundamental principles of criminal liabilityactus reus. Different crimes have different mens rea requirements the purpose of this.
To be found guilty of a crime, the prosecution must prove that there was a physical action, actus reus, and a state of mind to commit a crime, known as mens rea. Contrast this with mens rea, which refers to the criminal intent element of a crime. Appreciate the difference between voluntary and involuntary acts. In many instances, the prosecutor will use inferences to prove the. Mens rea and actus reus are two essentials of any crime and are the principles used in most common law countries. These typically are public welfare offenses or crimes that protect public safety and security by regulating food, drugs. Today, in addition to meeting all of the actus reus elements of an offence, a defendant must be shown to have also have a guilty mind at the same time. The actus reus is the conduct element of an offence, this is what the defendant must have been proved to have done.
There is an evident legislative policy that would be undermined by a mens rea requirement. Actus reus wex us law lii legal information institute. Mens rea, or guilty mind, marks a central distinguishing feature of criminal law. The standard common law test of criminal liability is expressed in the latin phrase actus reus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea, i. English criminal lawmens rea wikibooks, open books for. Actus reus criminal act or omission and mens rea criminal intent usually go handinhand when discussing criminal responsibility. Criminal liability requires not only causing a prohibited harm or evil the actus reus of an offense but also a particular state of mind with regard to. Strict liability offenses require an actus reus, but do not incorporate a mens rea requirement. Omission alternately, the actus reus requirement can also be satisfied by an omission. Mens rea is supposed to serve as a gatekeeper at the front door of the justice system, separating innocent from criminal behavior. As with all other crimes, the prosecution must prove that the defendant committed an actus reus and had the requisite mens rea in order to obtain a conviction for acting as an accomplice. Pdf mens rea, or guilty mind, marks a central distinguishing feature of criminal law. The latin term for a guilty act, actus reus refers to the actions of the defendant.
A crime comprises an actus reus, or a criminal act or omission, and a mens rea, or a criminal intent. The conduct or state of affairs which a particular offence prohibits is called the actus reus and the state of mind which the accused must be proved to have had at the time of the conduct or during the existence of the state of affairs is called the mens rea. Understand actus reus and mens rea and the requirement of concurrence. General principles1 a definition generally speaking, crimes have two components. The crown must prove both elements of the offence, the actus reus and the mens rea, beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, it either represents the conduct andor the consequences that follow as a result of the conduct. Actus reus refers to the physical aspect of a crime while mens rea refers to the mental aspect. A brief overview congressional research service summary criminal justice reform has played a major role in the congressional agenda over the past several congresses, with sentencing reform bills making up the majority of the legislative action on this issue. This buzzle post sheds more light on the relationship and difference between actus reus and mens rea. Actus reus culpable action in latin is required to determine whether a crime has been committed, while mens rea guilty mind in latin is considered in determining the severity of.
The statutory crime is not derived from the common law. Charles manson as revealed in letters, photos, stories. The actus reus is that there needs to be unlawful touching of another persons body. How to answer law examination questions following the irac. Use the three comic book panels to illustrate the concepts of mens rea, actus reus and wilful blindness. Actus reus, or criminal action, is the essential physical element of criminal liability, while mens rea functions as the essential mental element. Accomplice mens rea and actus reus lawshelf educational. Relationship between actus reus and mens rea opinion front. The fundamental concept of crime in international criminal law.
Both actus reus and mens rea are elements of a crime in which both are necessary in order for the defendant to be liable. An introduction to criminal liability starting with actus reus, being the guilty act element of a crime. The concept of actus reus is the focus of this chapter. This article outlines some of the dangers of the traditional discussion of actus reus and mens rea. This stems from the belief that a person should only be criminally punished for a crime if they can be held. The most serious or culpable is purposely, and then knowingly, recklessly, and negligently. The concept of mens rea was developed when judges began to realise that an act alone could not in fact create criminal liability, unless accompanied with a defendants guilty state of mind. Judges order on joint criminal enterprise, case file no. A mens rea will be read in, particularly when given consideration of the record. Explain the elements of a crime in terms of mens rea and actus reus. Both these terms actually refer to more than just moral guilt, and each has a very specific meaning. The legal term actus reus, as used in modern times, stems from the 16th century writings of sir edward coke, in which he stated actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea, which means an act does not make a person guilty unless his mind is also guilty. This lesson is intended for students who have studied these issues in class, and who wish to further refine their knowledge and understanding of the topic.
In order to obtain a conviction of a defendant for being a principal or an accessory before the fact, the prosecution must prove that the defendant committed an act that either encouraged or. Mens rea is the mental element of a persons intention to commit a crime. Proving mens rea can be difficult because it pertains to what a person was actually thinking when a specific event or act occurred. This chapter completes our introduction to the basic elements of a crime by introducing you to criminal intent, concurrence, and causation.
In this lesson, we continue the discussion by examining the actus reus requirement of accomplice liability. The mens rea requirement is the same, basic intent. Common law doctrine traditionally paired mens rea with actus reus. This must be resisted as there are many ingredients in the answer, which requires careful planning and organization. The issue in this context is whether the potential defendant is likely to be found to have satisfied the required guilty conduct elements of the offence. Actus reus refers to the physical action of a crime, while mens rea refers to the intent and understanding of the criminal at the time of the crime. What is the relationship between actus reus and mens rea. Mens rea is concerned with what the defendant was thinking at the time he committed the actus reus. Article knowledge, recklessness and the connection requirement.
Difference between mens rea and actus reus compare the. While much of the litigation in criminal cases involves the applicable mens rea,2 rarely is there. Mens rea and actus reus are elements required for a crime to exist. The actus reus and mens rea of a crime is to be found embedded in its. A backpacker may force his or her way into a cabin to.
In some offences the actus reus may only be proved by proving mens rea. The mens rea is regarded as transferred when this divergence is immaterial to the definition of the offence. Generally speaking, for a person to be found guilty of a criminal offence he or she must have committed an illegal act actus reus and had the required state of mind mens rea for the criminal offence. Introduction in the last chapter we noted that a criminal act or actus reus is required to exist in unison with a criminal intent or mens rea, and as you soon will see, these two components must com bine to cause a prohibited injury or harm. Relationship between actus reus and mens rea actus reus and mens rea are two latin terms that are used in criminal law, and they indicate the basic elements of a crime.
How actus reus and mens rea interact help determine the culpability of a criminal. Exam heading a mens rea state the law this is the analysis in this situation, there is insufficient evidence of intention exam heading b actus reus state the law this is the analysis here, it is clear that ds actions were voluntary, and. Have students discuss the state of mind and actions involved in each. For those not so acquainted, they probably appear as some latin terms that dont really make much sense. Mens rea, or criminal intent, includes four possible states of mind. Mens rea is the guilty mind or guilty intention to commit a crime, with the intention of causing hurt to another person, animal, or with the express intention of disturbing the peace. This result is the same as that which results from a lack of actus reus because, as noted above, both mens rea and actus reus are elements of the crime that must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, and if they cannot be proven the defendant will be exonerated of. However, the terms actus reusand mens rea are so widely used that they will be retained for the purposes of exposition in this book. We learned that while mens rea involves the intent of the offender to commit the crime, actus reus involves the actual action of. Actus reus and the criminal law criminal liability. Thus, if a defendant acted on reflex, then the defendants conduct does not satisfy the actus reus requirement. The terms actus reus and mens rea developed in english law are derived from the principle stated by edward coke, namely, actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea, which means.
This video covers a basic definition of actus reus. While the actus reus determines whether an act is unlawful, the mens rea tries to define the level of moral. Mens rea and actus reus essentials of a crime ipleaders. The most blameworthy crimes are said to have been done purposely.
1625 1171 1611 788 104 407 859 408 1151 321 46 977 124 156 640 355 636 999 1538 54 1123 1493 74 99 1299 1225 875 716 1379 902 254 1440 689 472 1288 840 356 1046 604 292 1248